Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Romantic Writer - September 2006

The Romance of Archaeology

September 30th 2006 02:25
I felt it was time to mention one of my other great loves (apart from writing romance novels, reading, watching romantic television shows, and pink champagne...oh, and Astoria, Oregon, but we'll get to that another time)...

Archaeology.

Perhaps Brian Fagan summed it up best in his book, 'In the Beginning: An Introduction to Archaeology':

"Archaeology has always been thought of as a romantic subject...Many people associate archaeologists with buried treasure, the Great Pyramid, and grinning skeletons. They believe archaeologists are romantic heroes, like Indiana Jones in the movie Raiders of the Lost Ark. Cartoonists depict them as elderly, eccentric scholars in sun helmets digging up inscribed tablets in the shadow of Egyptian temples. They are thought to be typical absentminded professors, so deeply absorbed in the details of ancient life that they care little for the pressures and frustrations of modern life. Archaeology is believed to open doors to a world of romance and excitement, to discoveries like the spectacular tomb of the Egyptian pharaoh Tutankhamun..." Fagan, Brian, In the Beginning: An Introduction to Archaeology, 1988, p3.


Is it any wonder one of my (many) obsessions centres around this fascinating field?

I began studying archaeology at university in 2002, and somehow got distracted along the way by a fiance, then a husband (yes, the same man), then Miss Toddler...

And what a nice way to get distracted!

Then, of course, my writing, that has completed enveloped me and taken me over...

But archaeology is still there, in my heart, in my thoughts, in my daydreams...

And in my writing.

Yes, my novels feature this topic/career/field/obsession throughout...you could say archaeology even has a starring role in my work. And, after how Fagan describes it, and after seeing, through my studies, how it actually is, how could I not incorporate this fascinating field?


Archaeology is more than a field to me. It is a way of life for these scatterbrained professors...its a hobby for some, a job for others...

An obsession. A personality for some...Kit, my infamous (or not so famous, since so few have had the honor of reading all about her) heroine, her personality is a restless one, an adventurous one, a treasure-seeker, a digger.

This to me is archaeology.

Its a romance. A romance with history, with civilizations long-gone, with individuals buried by their loved ones in such a loving manner. Archaeology is creating stories out of a fragment of bone, out of a pot shard, and coming up with whole histories. A way of life, once there but now gone.

Archaeology is a romantic adventure, a journey through time, through ruins now ravaged by jungles. Yes, I had visions of myself, in the jungles of Central America, in the cavernous tombs of the Pharaohs, in the ruins of Pompeii, having all kinds of wonderful, amazing, treasure-filled adventures.

If you're going to dream, you may as well dream big, I say.

Perhaps this is why I've become a writer...if you're a writer, these dreams are seen immediately. You don't need a degree, money, knowing the right people...

My dreams are realized. I have these wonderful adventures.

They are all in my books.






43
Vote
   


'Bones' Plays Out Like A Romance Novel

September 28th 2006 04:01
I must admit that I'm addicted to the new TV show 'Bones.' In fact, it is the only thing that can distract me from my nightly ritual of writing.

Why, you may ask? Why is 'Bones' that good it tears me away from the laptop, when my husband, a house fire, or a million dollars arriving on my doorstep are unable to get this response?

The secret is this: I think 'Bones' plays out like a romance novel. And if there's two things I love in this world, its writing romance and reading romance. And now, seeing romance.

Yes, I know its a forensic/whodunnit show, but the underlying sexual tension between the two lead characters is unmissable. Obviously, because I just read a review in the TV guide liftout in the paper, that totally bags this said tension.

It had to be a male that wrote it.

After all, us females love this sort of 'will they or won't they...' Obviously we do, or top romance novelists wouldn't sell 300 million copies of their books worldwide. Romance is the number one category that sells...

And who can forget Joey and Dawson? Or Joey and Pacey? 'The Nanny?' 'Moonlighting?' Sexual tension sells...and is addictive viewing.

So, back to the reviewer had-to-be-male-thing...perhaps 'Bones' is aimed for women? Perhaps males just don't get it (was going to add something else, but don't want to offend my male audience...after all, my husband is male...I have a best mate that is male...my father is male...so on, and so on. Better just keep quiet). After all, the show is based around real life forensic anthropologist and author, Kathy Reichs - a female.

One of my best friends (not male this time) commented to me once that she really didn't get the female character in 'Bones,' Temperance Brennan. She felt she was too standoffish, and lacked serious social skills with other people.

This is true, if you watch the show. But I think the writers have latched onto something here, in the same vein as romance novels - if we go to my theories on Heros and Heroines, Temperance is your classic Heroine all over. She's top of her field (forensic anthropologist, working alongside the FBI), she's gorgeous, she's outspoken, she's intelligent, and, yes, she lacks any sort of people skills whatsoever...which is part of her charm.

The Hero is none other than David Boreanaz. Hello! Need I say more? He is the ultimate Hero...gorgeous, a little bit bad, he works for the FBI (and isn't that hot in itself??), and he talks back to our Heroine. Talks back, is short with her, they argue alot...

They drive each other insane. All in all, the tension runs thick and hot.

Just like a romance novel.

Some of you may point out that this show is based on Kathy Reichs books involving the same Heroine...but they're nothing like the show. In fact, her fiction books are very much like the forensic murder investigations that feature in each week's show, but the romantic tension is just not there. She's just not a romance writer - she is a top scientist, after all. She's probably far too busy for romance.

Thankfully, someone in television decided to make 'Bones' out of her books. Any 'Moonlighting' fans out there? This is the 'Moonlighting' for the noughties.

Love it.
87
Vote
   


Character Development - The Hero

September 27th 2006 03:16
Your Hero.

It is your Hero's time in the spotlight.

From a previous post of mine, it came to light there is some disagreement with my advice that the Romantic Hero must be bad. It seems there is some that don't agree - which you have every right to, and I'd love more of a discussion on this (just leave your comments, it gives me votes and lures me out of the world of nappies and cooking and cleaning and gets me into this writing world I love so much).

But for now, I'm sticking to my theory that the Hero has to bad. After all, do you really think readers, particularly women readers, are interested in a guy that caters to a woman's every need, brings her breakfast in bed, rings her five times a day, offers to drive her to the shops, and buys her jewellry?

No, this is not a hero. This is a stalker. Or some kind of crazy that should not be in the spotlight in a romance book.

At least, not in my romance books.

Us women don't want a chauffeur. We don't want annoying phone calls all day long (well, maybe we do...I won't go as far as to say we don't want jewellry...that could get me into alot of trouble). We want a man.

The Hero has to be unattainable, difficult, sometimes nasty, but only because he is just so frustrated and in love with the Heroine. This is a romance novel, after all. If the two lead characters got together in the first chapter, there would be no book.

Not to mention fun, sexual tension, a goal to the overall story...

And, before we forget another very important point...the Hero has to be hot. Preferably with bulging arm muscles, a rippling torso, and...well, you can figure the rest.

Of course, he has to have some depth, too. This is a character development post, after all.

Again, I'll list some of my favourite Hero's stats and background info, as I did for my Heroine:

His age: 27
Loves: Ghost hunting. Scotch. Beer. The view from his living room windows, overlooking his small, seaside town.
Hates: Pain.
Fear: That he'll exist forever in this eternal pain and loneliness. Giving his heart again to lose yet another loved one.
Dream: To have a family once again. For his business to be successful. To find his other half.

You can go on forever with your character stats. You can spend hours doing biographies on each of your characters, in each of your stories. And why not? Its fun, it sees your characters, and even your story, brought to life before your very eyes.

And if you settle back with a glass of wine, ignore your husband/kids/pets/whatever else is going on in your life, while you play around with your charcters' personalities, even better.

Us writers are an escapist bunch, after all.

93
Vote
   


More Posts
10 Posts
10 Posts
10 Posts
33 Posts dating from September 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
Moderated by Blog Cemetery
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]